Let’s defeat the anti-Israel student terrorists
Jewish students from the City University of New York recently attending a Hillel welcome-back dinner were surrounded by masked, screaming protesters who banged on windows and chanted, “Terrorist! Terrorist! Terrorist! All Zionists are racist! Dogs off campus!”
The protesters shoved pictures of dead babies in students’ faces and assaulted a Hillel staffer.
Campuses are already paying the price of last school year’s weak-kneed, appeasing administration responses, as violence and threats by radicals rachet up again.
Last school year, Jewish students were physically attacked and their civil rights blatantly denied by protesters. Universities were trespassed and vandalized, and their rules enforcing respectful behavior and academic freedom were trampled.
Sadly, it took both Jewish students and college administrators nearly the entire school year to understand — and respond to — the full impact of the calamity.
But the dust has not settled. Virtually no criminal protesters nor negligent universities have been punished. And organizers of last year’s insurrection are making their intentions clear: They’re back with a vengeance.
It’s time for those who care about Israel, Jewish students and the hallowed values of higher education in America to assess the battleground.
What have we learned about the motivations, ideologies and strategies of the protesters? What do we know about who is funding them? What do we understand about forcing university leaders to protect academic freedom and student safety? What do we know about the legal recourse open to those whose rights are violated on campus?
Finally, how can we, who are invested in these issues and their fair outcomes, ensure that justice is done — that we defeat student terrorism?
Supporters of Israel, Jewish students and academic freedom now understand that our campus enemies are neo-Marxist revolutionaries.
A few weeks ago, the Student Intifada coalition of anti-Israel pro-Palestinian groups promised “the total eradication of Western civilization.” They tell us they are fighting “US colonialist and imperialist institutions.” The neo-Marxists also say the world consists of two kinds of people — oppressors and oppressed. Jews and most Americans are considered oppressors.
Adding a racist note, the pro-Palestinian thugs simplistically claim that the oppressed are people of color, while their oppressors are white. Israel is thus (somehow) a white, colonial state — ignoring the fact that Jews originated as indigenous people of color in the Middle East, and most Israelis are people of color.
• • •
Pro-Hamas demonstrators are well-funded by establishment organizations. According to an analysis by Politico, donors include a who’s who of Democratic Party supporters: Soros, Rockefeller and Pritzker.
Pro-Hamas protesters also receive funding from abroad. The top donor? Qatar has donated more than $3 billion to about 28 universities across the United States since 2012. Qatar gives refuge to Hamas leaders and is a major financier of the terrorist group. Qatar’s funds are used to promote Marxist and postmodern thought, as well as anti-Israeli events, such as Israeli Apartheid Week.
Some efforts have forced meaningful reforms on campus, while others have not. For example, some donors have withheld their donations from colleges in the hopes of forcing them to fight Jew hatred. In one case, Robert Kraft, CEO of the New England Patriots, pulled his donations to Columbia University.
Unfortunately, little evidence proves that such withdrawals of individual financial support influence major universities.
Lawsuits and civil rights complaints have proven more effective. Following a lawsuit against New York University, where pro-Hamas protesters chanted, “Gas the Jews,” the university updated its Non-Discrimination and Harassment Policy to include language that identified “Zionist” as a term that can conceal the antisemitic intent of speech and other conduct that denigrates and excludes Jews.
In another settlement, North Carolina State University agreed to update its anti-discrimination policies to recognize anti-Zionism as a form of antisemitism and include antisemitism in its programming on racial and ethnic hatred.
Some lawmakers have also taken action to protect Jewish students and college campuses from student terrorists. North Carolina recently passed a law requiring all state institutions to abide by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism, which includes anti-Zionism. Ohio passed the CAMPUS Act, which requires public and private universities to adopt and enforce policies regarding racial, religious, and ethnic harassment.
• • •
At the federal level, the Restoring Civility on Campus Act was recently introduced in the Senate. It is intended to provide more transparency for federal civil rights investigations into reports of discrimination based on shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics, which includes antisemitism and Islamophobia. This legislation also increases fines that can be levied on colleges for failing to disclose a crime motivated by antisemitism on their annual security reports. Unfortunately, this act has yet to pass.
Here are four lessons learned to fight back against student terrorism on campus:
1. Neo-Marxist ideology is the main motivator for the pro-Hamas protesters. Rooting out curricula and faculty that foster this revolutionary ideology, such as critical race theory and violent “resistance” — including genocide — should be a top priority. Abolishing faculty tenure would also allow a housecleaning of revolutionaries ensconced in academic positions.
2. Funding that promotes the teaching of antisemitism and anti-Americanism needs to be curtailed, particularly that which comes from terrorist-supporting countries like Qatar.
3. State and federal levels of government need to enact legislation that ensures Jewish students are equally protected from hate-fueled discrimination on campus. Colleges should be required to include antisemitism and anti-Zionism as part of their anti-discrimination policies. Violators should be subject to severe financial penalties.
4. We should encourage aggressive legal action against post-secondary institutions that fail to protect Jewish students, as this has proven effective in changing these institutions’ policies.
We are fighting determined anti-Israel and anti-American enemies on campus. Those who commit illegal acts or break school policies deserve harsh punishment. Finally, we must ensure that Jewish students — and all other students — experience a safe learning environment, no matter their political leanings.
